Jim Andrews vs. Ed Johnson — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jim Andrews and Ed Johnson are closely matched on the surface stats. Ed Johnson posted stronger numbers in OPS (.606 vs .550) and on-base percentage (.375 vs .278). Jim Andrews had the advantage in slugging (.272 vs .231). By the career numbers, Ed Johnson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Andrews and Ed Johnson
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
53
140.09
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
4
141.18
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
227
600
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
17
600
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.613
0.613
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.677
0.677
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
19.72
52.13
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
1.37
48.49
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
63
166.52
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
6
211.76
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.227
0.227
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.555
0.555
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.6
0.6
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
46
121.59
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
3
105.88
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
19.5
51.54
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
1.84
64.91
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
5.54
5.54
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
8.5
8.5
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.56
0.56
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Fielding Stats for Jim Andrews and Ed Johnson
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
1.71
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
62.5
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.698
1.698
Ed Johnson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.25