Jim Andrews vs. Nat Jewett — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Andrews posted the stronger offensive profile against Nat Jewett. Jim Andrews posted stronger numbers in OPS (.550 vs .250) and on-base percentage (.278 vs .125). By the career numbers, Jim Andrews had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Andrews and Nat Jewett
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Nat Jewett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.613
0.613
Nat Jewett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Nat Jewett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
Nat Jewett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Nat Jewett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.088
0.088
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.555
0.555
Nat Jewett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
5.54
5.54
Nat Jewett
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Jim Andrews and Nat Jewett
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1
Nat Jewett
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
1.89
Nat Jewett
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
5
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
1.71
Nat Jewett
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
3.5
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Nat Jewett
Career
Per 9 Innings
70
70
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.698
1.698
Nat Jewett
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.5
3.5