Jim Andrews vs. Harry Huston — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Andrews posted the stronger offensive profile against Harry Huston. Jim Andrews posted stronger numbers in OPS (.550 vs .200) and on-base percentage (.278 vs .200). By the career numbers, Jim Andrews had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Andrews and Harry Huston
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
227
600
Harry Huston
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.613
0.613
Harry Huston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
0.3
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
19.72
52.13
Harry Huston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.03
3.21
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Harry Huston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Harry Huston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.09
0.09
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.555
0.555
Harry Huston
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
5.54
5.54
Harry Huston
Career
Per 600 PA
5
5
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.56
0.56
Harry Huston
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Fielding Stats for Jim Andrews and Harry Huston
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1
Harry Huston
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.64
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1425
27
Harry Huston
Career
Per 9 Innings
33
27
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
475
9
Harry Huston
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
9
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
1.89
Harry Huston
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
5.73
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
1.71
Harry Huston
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
5.73
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Harry Huston
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.698
1.698
Harry Huston
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.5
3.5
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Harry Huston
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.82