Jim Andrews vs. Neal Hertweck — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Andrews posted the stronger offensive profile against Neal Hertweck. Jim Andrews posted stronger numbers in OPS (.550 vs .143) and on-base percentage (.278 vs .143). By the career numbers, Jim Andrews had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Andrews and Neal Hertweck
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
53
140.09
Neal Hertweck
Career
Per 600 PA
2
171.43
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
227
600
Neal Hertweck
Career
Per 600 PA
7
600
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.613
0.613
Neal Hertweck
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
19.72
52.13
Neal Hertweck
Career
Per 600 PA
0.02
1.54
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
63
166.52
Neal Hertweck
Career
Per 600 PA
1
85.71
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Neal Hertweck
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Neal Hertweck
Career
Per 600 PA
0.064
0.064
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.555
0.555
Neal Hertweck
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
5.54
5.54
Neal Hertweck
Career
Per 600 PA
7
7
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.56
0.56
Neal Hertweck
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Neal Hertweck
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim Andrews and Neal Hertweck
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1
Neal Hertweck
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
1.89
Neal Hertweck
Career
Per 9 Innings
21
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
1.71
Neal Hertweck
Career
Per 9 Innings
21
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Neal Hertweck
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.698
1.698
Neal Hertweck
Career
Per 9 Innings
10.5