Jim Andrews vs. Ed Haigh — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Andrews posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Haigh. Jim Andrews posted stronger numbers in OPS (.550 vs .500) and on-base percentage (.278 vs .250). Ed Haigh had the advantage in batting average (.250 vs .188). By the career numbers, Jim Andrews had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Andrews and Ed Haigh
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.613
0.613
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.555
0.555
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
19.5
51.54
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.28
41.68
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
5.54
5.54
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Fielding Stats for Jim Andrews and Ed Haigh
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9