Jim Andrews vs. Hugh Gilgan — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Andrews posted the stronger offensive profile against Hugh Gilgan. Jim Andrews posted stronger numbers in OPS (.550 vs .500) and on-base percentage (.278 vs .250). Hugh Gilgan had the advantage in batting average (.250 vs .188). By the career numbers, Jim Andrews had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Andrews and Hugh Gilgan
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
227
600
Hugh Gilgan
Career
Per 600 PA
8
600
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Hugh Gilgan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.613
0.613
Hugh Gilgan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
19.72
52.13
Hugh Gilgan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.45
34.02
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Hugh Gilgan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
Hugh Gilgan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Hugh Gilgan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.555
0.555
Hugh Gilgan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
19.5
51.54
Hugh Gilgan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.6
45.21
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
5.54
5.54
Hugh Gilgan
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Jim Andrews and Hugh Gilgan
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1
Hugh Gilgan
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.5
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1425
27
Hugh Gilgan
Career
Per 9 Innings
36
27
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
1.89
Hugh Gilgan
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
2.25
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
1.71
Hugh Gilgan
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
2.25
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Hugh Gilgan
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.698
1.698
Hugh Gilgan
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.5
1.5