Jim Andrews vs. Buck Danner — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Andrews posted the stronger offensive profile against Buck Danner. Jim Andrews posted stronger numbers in OPS (.550 vs .500) and on-base percentage (.278 vs .250). Buck Danner had the advantage in batting average (.250 vs .188). By the career numbers, Jim Andrews had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Andrews and Buck Danner
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
227
600
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.613
0.613
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.568
0.568
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
19.72
52.13
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.86
43.11
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.555
0.555
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.444
0.444
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
19.5
51.54
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
1.04
51.86
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
5.54
5.54
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
12
12
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
11
29.07
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
1
50
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Buck Danner
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Jim Andrews and Buck Danner
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1
Buck Danner
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
1.89
Buck Danner
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
1.71
Buck Danner
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Buck Danner
Career
Per 9 Innings
75
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.698
1.698
Buck Danner
Career
Per 9 Innings
3