Jim Andrews vs. Dan Ardell — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jim Andrews and Dan Ardell are closely matched on the surface stats. Dan Ardell posted stronger numbers in OPS (.650 vs .550) and on-base percentage (.400 vs .278). Jim Andrews had the advantage in slugging (.272 vs .250). By the career numbers, Dan Ardell had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Andrews and Dan Ardell
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.613
0.613
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.555
0.555
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
19.5
51.54
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.66
65.95
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
5.54
5.54
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
3
3
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.56
0.56
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Fielding Stats for Jim Andrews and Dan Ardell
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
1.89
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
13
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
1.71
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
13
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.698
1.698
Dan Ardell
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
13