Jim Andrews vs. Dean Anna — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jim Andrews and Dean Anna are closely matched on the surface stats. Jim Andrews posted stronger numbers in OPS (.550 vs .497) and on-base percentage (.278 vs .192). Dean Anna had the advantage in slugging (.304 vs .272). By the career numbers, Jim Andrews had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Andrews and Dean Anna
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.13
0.13
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.613
0.613
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.539
0.539
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.015
0.015
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.044
0.044
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.079
0.079
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.192
0.192
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.304
0.304
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.084
0.084
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.174
0.174
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.163
0.163
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.555
0.555
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.45
0.45
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
19.5
51.54
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
1.23
28.33
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
5.54
5.54
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
4.33
4.33
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.56
0.56
Dean Anna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
0.33
Fielding Stats for Jim Andrews and Dean Anna
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
1.75
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
1.89
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
3.36
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
1.71
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
3.22
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
90
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
96
96
Jim Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.698
1.698
Dean Anna
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.846
1.846