Fred Andrews vs. Hal Luby — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Fred Andrews posted the stronger offensive profile against Hal Luby. Fred Andrews posted stronger numbers in OPS (.698 vs .654) and slugging (.345 vs .305). Hal Luby had the advantage in home run production (2 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Fred Andrews had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Fred Andrews and Hal Luby
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
16
282.35
Hal Luby
Career
Per 600 PA
120
169.41
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.276
0.276
Hal Luby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.247
0.247
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.757
0.757
Hal Luby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.693
0.693
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Hal Luby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.169
0.169
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
12
211.76
Hal Luby
Career
Per 600 PA
146
206.12
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.353
0.353
Hal Luby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.349
0.349
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.345
0.345
Hal Luby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.305
0.305
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.069
0.069
Hal Luby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.245
0.245
Hal Luby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.233
0.233
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.696
0.696
Hal Luby
Career
Per 600 PA
0.609
0.609
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
4.19
73.87
Hal Luby
Career
Per 600 PA
47.22
66.67
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
6.8
6.8
Hal Luby
Career
Per 600 PA
19.32
19.32
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.6
0.6
Hal Luby
Career
Per 600 PA
2.36
2.36
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
1
17.65
Hal Luby
Career
Per 600 PA
9
12.71
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
3
52.94
Hal Luby
Career
Per 600 PA
4
5.65
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
66.67
66.67
Hal Luby
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Fred Andrews and Hal Luby
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
1.41
Hal Luby
Career
Per 9 Innings
120
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
44
5.66
Hal Luby
Career
Per 9 Innings
467
Fred Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Hal Luby
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.92