Curley Andrews vs. Lloyd McClendon — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Lloyd McClendon posted the stronger offensive profile against Curley Andrews. Lloyd McClendon posted stronger numbers in OPS (.709 vs .566) and on-base percentage (.328 vs .250). By the career numbers, Lloyd McClendon had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Curley Andrews and Lloyd McClendon
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
9
270
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
570
248.73
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
20
600
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
1375
600
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
19
570
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
1204
525.38
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.575
0.575
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.729
0.729
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
1
30
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
92
40.15
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.313
0.313
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.029
0.029
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
1.55
46.36
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
156.23
68.17
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
6
180
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
459
200.29
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
5
150
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
445
194.18
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.325
0.325
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.316
0.316
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.381
0.381
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.566
0.566
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.706
0.706
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.105
0.105
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.137
0.137
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.192
0.192
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.241
0.241
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.467
0.467
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.661
0.661
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.254
0.254
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
7
210
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
269
117.38
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
1.75
52.36
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
159.41
69.56
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
8.33
8.33
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
24
10.47
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
27
11.78
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 600 PA
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 600 PA
55.56
55.56
Fielding Stats for Curley Andrews and Lloyd McClendon
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.64
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 9 Innings
420
1.5
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.23
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 9 Innings
282
1.01
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
132
27
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 9 Innings
7564
27
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
44
9
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 9 Innings
2521.1
9
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
2.45
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 9 Innings
1150
4.1
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
2.05
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 9 Innings
73
0.26
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.02
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
0.08
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
27
5.52
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 9 Innings
1246
4.45
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
22
4.5
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 9 Innings
1223
4.37
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
81.48
81.48
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.15
98.15
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.75
2.75
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.912
2.912
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
75
75
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 9 Innings
67.14
67.14
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.2
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 9 Innings
63
0.22
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
0.05
Curley Andrews
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Lloyd McClendon
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
0.02