Kent Anderson vs. Ed Haigh — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kent Anderson posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Haigh. Kent Anderson posted stronger numbers in OPS (.631 vs .500) and on-base percentage (.320 vs .250). By the career numbers, Kent Anderson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kent Anderson and Ed Haigh
Kent Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.26
0.26
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Kent Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.651
0.651
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Kent Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
34.53
50.66
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
34.02
Kent Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.318
0.318
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Kent Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.312
0.312
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Kent Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.221
0.221
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Kent Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.519
0.519
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Kent Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
39.89
58.51
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.28
41.68
Kent Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
6.7
6.7
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Kent Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
8
11.74
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Kent Anderson and Ed Haigh
Kent Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
133
1.18
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9
Kent Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1018.1
9
Ed Haigh
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
9