Jim Anderson vs. Baby Webb — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Anderson posted the stronger offensive profile against Baby Webb. Jim Anderson posted stronger numbers in OPS (.579 vs .473) and on-base percentage (.281 vs .273). By the career numbers, Jim Anderson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Anderson and Baby Webb
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
1091
600
Baby Webb
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.218
0.218
Baby Webb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.608
0.608
Baby Webb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.542
0.542
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
80.23
44.12
Baby Webb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.57
28.42
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.28
0.28
Baby Webb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.298
0.298
Baby Webb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Baby Webb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.173
0.173
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.483
0.483
Baby Webb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
82.22
45.22
Baby Webb
Career
Per 600 PA
0.77
38.32
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
8.39
8.39
Baby Webb
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
23
12.65
Baby Webb
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim Anderson and Baby Webb
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
409
1.4
Baby Webb
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.13
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
2628.1
9
Baby Webb
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
9
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1475
5.05
Baby Webb
Career
Per 9 Innings
27
10.13
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1407
4.82
Baby Webb
Career
Per 9 Innings
26
9.75
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.39
95.39
Baby Webb
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.3
96.3
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.44
3.44
Baby Webb
Career
Per 9 Innings
8.667
8.667