Jim Anderson vs. Shorty Dee — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Anderson posted the stronger offensive profile against Shorty Dee. Jim Anderson posted stronger numbers in OPS (.579 vs .250) and on-base percentage (.281 vs .250). By the career numbers, Jim Anderson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Anderson and Shorty Dee
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
1091
600
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.608
0.608
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
0.3
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.28
0.28
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
0.113
0.113
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.483
0.483
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
8.39
8.39
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
23
12.65
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
22
12.1
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 600 PA
1
150
Fielding Stats for Jim Anderson and Shorty Dee
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
409
1.4
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1475
5.05
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1407
4.82
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
Jim Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.39
95.39
Shorty Dee
Career
Per 9 Innings
50