Hal Anderson vs. Ned Connor — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Hal Anderson posted the stronger offensive profile against Ned Connor. Hal Anderson posted stronger numbers in OPS (.500 vs .424) and on-base percentage (.250 vs .212). By the career numbers, Hal Anderson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Hal Anderson and Ned Connor
Hal Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
9
163.64
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
7
127.27
Hal Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
33
600
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
33
600
Hal Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.212
0.212
Hal Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.424
0.424
Hal Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
1.56
28.34
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
1.34
24.38
Hal Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
8
145.45
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
7
127.27
Hal Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.212
0.212
Hal Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.212
0.212
Hal Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.149
0.149
Hal Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.32
0.32
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.269
0.269
Hal Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
6
109.09
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
8
145.45
Hal Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
2.07
37.58
Ned Connor
Career
Per 600 PA
1.57
28.6
Fielding Stats for Hal Anderson and Ned Connor
Hal Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
0.98
Hal Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
22
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
41
5.77
Hal Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
82
82
Hal Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.444
Ned Connor
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.857
5.857