C. Anderson vs. Ed Sicking — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Sicking posted the stronger offensive profile against C. Anderson. Ed Sicking posted stronger numbers in OPS (.532 vs .167) and on-base percentage (.277 vs .083). By the career numbers, Ed Sicking had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for C. Anderson and Ed Sicking
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
654
600
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.226
0.226
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.571
0.571
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.277
0.277
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.255
0.255
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.445
0.445
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
15.21
15.21
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
1
50
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
19
17.43
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
73.68
73.68
Fielding Stats for C. Anderson and Ed Sicking
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 9 Innings
195
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 9 Innings
803
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.33
83.33
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.36