C. Anderson vs. Jim Shilling — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Shilling posted the stronger offensive profile against C. Anderson. Jim Shilling posted stronger numbers in OPS (.744 vs .167) and on-base percentage (.324 vs .083). By the career numbers, Jim Shilling had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for C. Anderson and Jim Shilling
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Jim Shilling
Career
Per 600 PA
140
600
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim Shilling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.282
0.282
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Jim Shilling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.755
0.755
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
7.27
Jim Shilling
Career
Per 600 PA
16.48
70.62
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim Shilling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.324
0.324
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim Shilling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.42
0.42
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Jim Shilling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.251
0.251
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Jim Shilling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.647
0.647
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Shilling
Career
Per 600 PA
10.77
10.77
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Shilling
Career
Per 600 PA
5
21.43
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
1
50
Jim Shilling
Career
Per 600 PA
1
4.29
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Jim Shilling
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for C. Anderson and Jim Shilling
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Jim Shilling
Career
Per 9 Innings
42
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.59
Jim Shilling
Career
Per 9 Innings
198
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Jim Shilling
Career
Per 9 Innings
184
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.33
83.33
Jim Shilling
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.93