C. Anderson vs. Pat Scanlon — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pat Scanlon posted the stronger offensive profile against C. Anderson. Pat Scanlon posted stronger numbers in OPS (.625 vs .167) and on-base percentage (.292 vs .083). By the career numbers, Pat Scanlon had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for C. Anderson and Pat Scanlon
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
24
600
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.625
0.625
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.215
0.215
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.471
0.471
Fielding Stats for C. Anderson and Pat Scanlon
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
0.98
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
102
27
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 9 Innings
165
27
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.59
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
1.64
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.31
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.33
83.33
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 9 Innings
80
80
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.333
1.333