C. Anderson vs. Jim Poole — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Poole posted the stronger offensive profile against C. Anderson. Jim Poole posted stronger numbers in OPS (.748 vs .167) and on-base percentage (.333 vs .083). By the career numbers, Jim Poole had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for C. Anderson and Jim Poole
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
1028
600
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.288
0.288
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.761
0.761
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.415
0.415
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.254
0.254
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.683
0.683
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
15.12
15.12
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
1
50
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
16
9.34
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
56.25
56.25
Fielding Stats for C. Anderson and Jim Poole
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Jim Poole
Career
Per 9 Innings
256
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Jim Poole
Career
Per 9 Innings
2449
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.33
83.33
Jim Poole
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.67