C. Anderson vs. John Perrigan — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, John Perrigan posted the stronger offensive profile against C. Anderson. John Perrigan posted stronger numbers in OPS (.555 vs .167) and on-base percentage (.355 vs .083). By the career numbers, John Perrigan had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for C. Anderson and John Perrigan
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
5
250
John Perrigan
Career
Per 600 PA
12
218.18
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
John Perrigan
Career
Per 600 PA
33
600
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
John Perrigan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
John Perrigan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.636
0.636
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
7.27
John Perrigan
Career
Per 600 PA
2.22
40.38
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
John Perrigan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.355
0.355
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
John Perrigan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
John Perrigan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.21
0.21
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
John Perrigan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.55
0.55
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
John Perrigan
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for C. Anderson and John Perrigan
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
John Perrigan
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
1.27
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
0.79
John Perrigan
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
1.04
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
102
27
John Perrigan
Career
Per 9 Innings
234
27
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
34
9
John Perrigan
Career
Per 9 Innings
78
9
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.59
John Perrigan
Career
Per 9 Innings
36
4.15
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
John Perrigan
Career
Per 9 Innings
32
3.69
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.33
83.33
John Perrigan
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.89
88.89
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
John Perrigan
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.909
2.909
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
60
60
John Perrigan
Career
Per 9 Innings
81.82
81.82