C. Anderson vs. Jim O'Neill — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim O'Neill posted the stronger offensive profile against C. Anderson. Jim O'Neill posted stronger numbers in OPS (.715 vs .167) and on-base percentage (.321 vs .083). By the career numbers, Jim O'Neill had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for C. Anderson and Jim O'Neill
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
354
600
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.288
0.288
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.738
0.738
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
7.27
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
41.41
70.19
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.321
0.321
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.395
0.395
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
0.644
0.644
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
10.73
10.73
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
1
50
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
10
16.95
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 600 PA
70
70
Fielding Stats for C. Anderson and Jim O'Neill
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
96
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
439
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.33
83.33
Jim O'Neill
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.21