C. Anderson vs. Pat Newnam — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pat Newnam posted the stronger offensive profile against C. Anderson. Pat Newnam posted stronger numbers in OPS (.565 vs .167) and on-base percentage (.287 vs .083). By the career numbers, Pat Newnam had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for C. Anderson and Pat Newnam
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
500
600
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.213
0.213
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.624
0.624
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.287
0.287
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.199
0.199
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
0.541
0.541
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
6.02
6.02
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for C. Anderson and Pat Newnam
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
123
1.23
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
0.79
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
103
1.03
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
102
27
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
2697
27
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.59
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
1346
13.47
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
1311
13.12
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.33
83.33
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.4
97.4
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
10.659
10.659
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
60
60
Pat Newnam
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.74
83.74