C. Anderson vs. Jim McManus — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McManus posted the stronger offensive profile against C. Anderson. Jim McManus posted stronger numbers in OPS (.896 vs .167) and on-base percentage (.357 vs .083). By the career numbers, Jim McManus had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for C. Anderson and Jim McManus
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
14
600
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
0.893
0.893
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
0.539
0.539
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
0.295
0.295
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
0.8
0.8
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
1
42.86
Fielding Stats for C. Anderson and Jim McManus
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Jim McManus
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
0.79
Jim McManus
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.59
Jim McManus
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
10
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Jim McManus
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
10
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.33
83.33
Jim McManus
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
60
60
Jim McManus
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100