C. Anderson vs. Jim McDonnell — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McDonnell posted the stronger offensive profile against C. Anderson. Jim McDonnell posted stronger numbers in OPS (.503 vs .167) and on-base percentage (.272 vs .083). By the career numbers, Jim McDonnell had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for C. Anderson and Jim McDonnell
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
5
250
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
50
285.71
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
105
600
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.533
0.533
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
7.27
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
5.1
29.15
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.232
0.232
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
0.18
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.38
0.38
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
13.13
13.13
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
4
22.86
Fielding Stats for C. Anderson and Jim McDonnell
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 9 Innings
37
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.59
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 9 Innings
150
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 9 Innings
143
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.33
83.33
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.33