C. Anderson vs. Tuts McBride — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Tuts McBride posted the stronger offensive profile against C. Anderson. Tuts McBride posted stronger numbers in OPS (.730 vs .167) and on-base percentage (.444 vs .083). By the career numbers, Tuts McBride had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for C. Anderson and Tuts McBride
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Tuts McBride
Career
Per 600 PA
10
600
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Tuts McBride
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Tuts McBride
Career
Per 600 PA
0.8
0.8
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
7.27
Tuts McBride
Career
Per 600 PA
1.13
68.08
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Tuts McBride
Career
Per 600 PA
0.444
0.444
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Tuts McBride
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Tuts McBride
Career
Per 600 PA
0.271
0.271
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Tuts McBride
Career
Per 600 PA
0.8
0.8
Fielding Stats for C. Anderson and Tuts McBride
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Tuts McBride
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.71
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
0.79
Tuts McBride
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
0.86
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
102
27
Tuts McBride
Career
Per 9 Innings
63
27
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.59
Tuts McBride
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.71
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Tuts McBride
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.71
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.33
83.33
Tuts McBride
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
60
60
Tuts McBride
Career
Per 9 Innings
50
50