C. Anderson vs. Ray Mack — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ray Mack posted the stronger offensive profile against C. Anderson. Ray Mack posted stronger numbers in OPS (.631 vs .167) and on-base percentage (.301 vs .083). By the career numbers, Ray Mack had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for C. Anderson and Ray Mack
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Ray Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.232
0.232
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Ray Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.656
0.656
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Ray Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.301
0.301
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Ray Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
0.33
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Ray Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.218
0.218
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Ray Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.555
0.555
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ray Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
58
11.54
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
1
50
Ray Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
52
10.34
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Ray Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
67.31
67.31
Fielding Stats for C. Anderson and Ray Mack
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Ray Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
789
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Ray Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
4134
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.33
83.33
Ray Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.63