C. Anderson vs. Connie Mack — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Connie Mack posted the stronger offensive profile against C. Anderson. Connie Mack posted stronger numbers in OPS (.604 vs .167) and on-base percentage (.305 vs .083). By the career numbers, Connie Mack had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for C. Anderson and Connie Mack
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
2949
600
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.656
0.656
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
7.27
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
286.4
58.27
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.305
0.305
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
0.3
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.212
0.212
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.574
0.574
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
23.22
23.22
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
1
50
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
127
25.84
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Connie Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for C. Anderson and Connie Mack
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Connie Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
729
1.06
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
102
27
Connie Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
18513
27
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
34
9
Connie Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
6171
9
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.59
Connie Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
4556
6.64
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Connie Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
4238
6.18
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.33
83.33
Connie Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.02
93.02
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Connie Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.813
5.813
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Connie Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
460
0.67