C. Anderson vs. Jim Hitchcock — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Hitchcock posted the stronger offensive profile against C. Anderson. Jim Hitchcock posted stronger numbers in OPS (.363 vs .167) and on-base percentage (.192 vs .083). By the career numbers, Jim Hitchcock had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for C. Anderson and Jim Hitchcock
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
5
250
Jim Hitchcock
Career
Per 600 PA
28
212.66
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Jim Hitchcock
Career
Per 600 PA
79
600
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim Hitchcock
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Jim Hitchcock
Career
Per 600 PA
0.391
0.391
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
7.27
Jim Hitchcock
Career
Per 600 PA
2.12
16.06
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim Hitchcock
Career
Per 600 PA
0.192
0.192
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim Hitchcock
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Jim Hitchcock
Career
Per 600 PA
0.129
0.129
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Jim Hitchcock
Career
Per 600 PA
0.246
0.246
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Hitchcock
Career
Per 600 PA
7.18
7.18
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Hitchcock
Career
Per 600 PA
2
15.19
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
1
50
Jim Hitchcock
Career
Per 600 PA
1
7.59
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Jim Hitchcock
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for C. Anderson and Jim Hitchcock
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Jim Hitchcock
Career
Per 9 Innings
26
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.59
Jim Hitchcock
Career
Per 9 Innings
124
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Jim Hitchcock
Career
Per 9 Innings
109
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.33
83.33
Jim Hitchcock
Career
Per 9 Innings
87.9