C. Anderson vs. Mack Hillis — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Mack Hillis posted the stronger offensive profile against C. Anderson. Mack Hillis posted stronger numbers in OPS (.784 vs .167) and on-base percentage (.243 vs .083). By the career numbers, Mack Hillis had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for C. Anderson and Mack Hillis
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Mack Hillis
Career
Per 600 PA
39
600
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Mack Hillis
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Mack Hillis
Career
Per 600 PA
0.814
0.814
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Mack Hillis
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Mack Hillis
Career
Per 600 PA
0.541
0.541
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Mack Hillis
Career
Per 600 PA
0.245
0.245
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Mack Hillis
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
1
50
Mack Hillis
Career
Per 600 PA
1
15.38
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Mack Hillis
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for C. Anderson and Mack Hillis
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Mack Hillis
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Mack Hillis
Career
Per 9 Innings
39
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.33
83.33
Mack Hillis
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.12