C. Anderson vs. Pat Hannivan — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pat Hannivan posted the stronger offensive profile against C. Anderson. Pat Hannivan posted stronger numbers in OPS (.625 vs .167) and on-base percentage (.375 vs .083). By the career numbers, Pat Hannivan had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for C. Anderson and Pat Hannivan
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 600 PA
26
600
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.805
0.805
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
7.27
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 600 PA
3.33
76.79
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.867
0.867
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
1
50
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 600 PA
4
92.31
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for C. Anderson and Pat Hannivan
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
0.92
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
102
27
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 9 Innings
147
27
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.59
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 9 Innings
22
4.04
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 9 Innings
19
3.49
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.33
83.33
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 9 Innings
86.36
86.36
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Pat Hannivan
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.8
3.8