C. Anderson vs. Jim Hackett — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Hackett posted the stronger offensive profile against C. Anderson. Jim Hackett posted stronger numbers in OPS (.588 vs .167) and on-base percentage (.276 vs .083). By the career numbers, Jim Hackett had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for C. Anderson and Jim Hackett
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
397
600
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.607
0.607
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
7.27
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
33.59
50.76
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.276
0.276
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.312
0.312
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.202
0.202
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.497
0.497
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
6.84
6.84
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
1
50
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
3
4.53
C. Anderson
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for C. Anderson and Jim Hackett
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 9 Innings
102
1.05
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
102
27
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 9 Innings
2616
27
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.59
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 9 Innings
1047
10.81
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.32
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 9 Innings
1015
10.48
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
83.33
83.33
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.94
96.94
C. Anderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Jim Hackett
Career
Per 9 Innings
9.951
9.951