Ed Amelung vs. Tom Padden — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Tom Padden posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Amelung. Tom Padden posted stronger numbers in OPS (.666 vs .413) and on-base percentage (.345 vs .220). By the career numbers, Tom Padden had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Amelung and Tom Padden
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
60
600
Tom Padden
Career
Per 600 PA
1319
600
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Tom Padden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.46
0.46
Tom Padden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.691
0.691
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
1.97
19.66
Tom Padden
Career
Per 600 PA
128.89
58.63
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.22
0.22
Tom Padden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.345
0.345
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Tom Padden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.321
0.321
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.147
0.147
Tom Padden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.235
0.235
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.32
0.32
Tom Padden
Career
Per 600 PA
0.579
0.579
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
1.53
15.27
Tom Padden
Career
Per 600 PA
150.56
68.49
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
7.5
7.5
Tom Padden
Career
Per 600 PA
10.9
10.9
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Tom Padden
Career
Per 600 PA
1.05
1.05
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
2
20
Tom Padden
Career
Per 600 PA
31
14.1
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
60
60
Tom Padden
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Ed Amelung and Tom Padden
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 9 Innings
27
2.07
Tom Padden
Career
Per 9 Innings
379
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 9 Innings
36
2.75
Tom Padden
Career
Per 9 Innings
1704
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Tom Padden
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.65
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.333
1.333
Tom Padden
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.496