Ed Amelung vs. Jim Galloway — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Galloway posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Amelung. Jim Galloway posted stronger numbers in OPS (.476 vs .413) and on-base percentage (.254 vs .220). Ed Amelung had the advantage in batting average (.193 vs .185). By the career numbers, Jim Galloway had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Amelung and Jim Galloway
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
60
600
Jim Galloway
Career
Per 600 PA
62
600
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Jim Galloway
Career
Per 600 PA
0.185
0.185
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.46
0.46
Jim Galloway
Career
Per 600 PA
0.551
0.551
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.22
0.22
Jim Galloway
Career
Per 600 PA
0.254
0.254
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Jim Galloway
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.147
0.147
Jim Galloway
Career
Per 600 PA
0.17
0.17
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.32
0.32
Jim Galloway
Career
Per 600 PA
0.432
0.432
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
1.53
15.27
Jim Galloway
Career
Per 600 PA
3.78
36.6
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
7.5
7.5
Jim Galloway
Career
Per 600 PA
7.75
7.75
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Galloway
Career
Per 600 PA
0.63
0.63
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
5
50
Jim Galloway
Career
Per 600 PA
2
19.35
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
60
60
Jim Galloway
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Ed Amelung and Jim Galloway
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 9 Innings
27
2.07
Jim Galloway
Career
Per 9 Innings
17
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 9 Innings
36
2.75
Jim Galloway
Career
Per 9 Innings
73
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Galloway
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.33
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.333
1.333
Jim Galloway
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.294