Ed Amelung vs. Daniel Fields — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Daniel Fields posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Amelung. Daniel Fields posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .413) and on-base percentage (.333 vs .220). By the career numbers, Daniel Fields had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Amelung and Daniel Fields
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
60
600
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
3
600
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.46
0.46
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
1.97
19.66
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.55
109.5
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.22
0.22
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
0.147
0.147
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.317
0.317
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
1.53
15.27
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0.52
104.46
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
7.5
7.5
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 600 PA
2
20
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Ed Amelung and Daniel Fields
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 9 Innings
27
2.07
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.29
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 9 Innings
353
27
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
21
27
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 9 Innings
117.2
9
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
9
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 9 Innings
36
2.75
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3.86
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 9 Innings
36
2.75
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2.57
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67
Ed Amelung
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.333
1.333
Daniel Fields
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2