Trey Amburgey vs. Jack Meyers — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jack Meyers posted the stronger offensive profile against Trey Amburgey. Jack Meyers posted stronger numbers in OPS (.744 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.367 vs .000). By the career numbers, Jack Meyers had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Trey Amburgey and Jack Meyers
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 600 PA
2
300
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 600 PA
992
184.5
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 600 PA
3226
600
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 600 PA
0.367
0.367
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 600 PA
0.26
0.26
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.75
-112.87
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 600 PA
472.13
87.81
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 600 PA
18.54
18.54
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 600 PA
1
150
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Trey Amburgey and Jack Meyers
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.64
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 9 Innings
911
5.52
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.64
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 9 Innings
180
1.09
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 9 Innings
33
27
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 9 Innings
4452
27
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
9
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 9 Innings
1484
9
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
4.91
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 9 Innings
4537
27.52
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
4.91
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 9 Innings
5679
34.44
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
4.91
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 9 Innings
5533
33.56
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.43
97.43
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.074
6.074
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 9 Innings
19.76
19.76
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 9 Innings
173
1.05
Trey Amburgey
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Jack Meyers
Career
Per 9 Innings
159
0.96