Ruben Amaro Jr. vs. Alex Sabo — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Alex Sabo posted the stronger offensive profile against Ruben Amaro Jr.. Alex Sabo posted stronger numbers in OPS (.750 vs .664) and on-base percentage (.375 vs .311). Ruben Amaro Jr. had the advantage in home run production (16 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Alex Sabo had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ruben Amaro Jr. and Alex Sabo
Ruben Amaro Jr.
Career
Per 600 PA
485
277.14
Alex Sabo
Career
Per 600 PA
5
375
Ruben Amaro Jr.
Career
Per 600 PA
1050
600
Alex Sabo
Career
Per 600 PA
8
600
Ruben Amaro Jr.
Career
Per 600 PA
0.235
0.235
Alex Sabo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Ruben Amaro Jr.
Career
Per 600 PA
0.69
0.69
Alex Sabo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Ruben Amaro Jr.
Career
Per 600 PA
104.74
59.85
Alex Sabo
Career
Per 600 PA
1.04
77.75
Ruben Amaro Jr.
Career
Per 600 PA
0.31
0.31
Alex Sabo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Ruben Amaro Jr.
Career
Per 600 PA
0.353
0.353
Alex Sabo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Ruben Amaro Jr.
Career
Per 600 PA
0.228
0.228
Alex Sabo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.263
0.263
Ruben Amaro Jr.
Career
Per 600 PA
0.602
0.602
Alex Sabo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.6
0.6
Ruben Amaro Jr.
Career
Per 600 PA
183
104.57
Alex Sabo
Career
Per 600 PA
2
150
Ruben Amaro Jr.
Career
Per 600 PA
107.11
61.2
Alex Sabo
Career
Per 600 PA
1.33
99.87
Ruben Amaro Jr.
Career
Per 600 PA
8.2
8.2
Alex Sabo
Career
Per 600 PA
4
4
Ruben Amaro Jr.
Career
Per 600 PA
22
12.57
Alex Sabo
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Ruben Amaro Jr. and Alex Sabo
Ruben Amaro Jr.
Career
Per 9 Innings
332
1.67
Alex Sabo
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
Ruben Amaro Jr.
Career
Per 9 Innings
489
2.45
Alex Sabo
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
Ruben Amaro Jr.
Career
Per 9 Innings
483
2.42
Alex Sabo
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
Ruben Amaro Jr.
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.77
98.77
Alex Sabo
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.86
Ruben Amaro Jr.
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.455
1.455
Alex Sabo
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.6