Pete Alonso vs. Jim Thurman — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pete Alonso posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Thurman. Pete Alonso posted stronger numbers in OPS (.864 vs .143) and on-base percentage (.348 vs .143). By the career numbers, Pete Alonso had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pete Alonso and Jim Thurman
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
1007
139.99
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
3
257.14
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
4316
600
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
7
600
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
0.861
0.861
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
671.71
93.38
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.02
1.54
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
1470
204.36
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
1
85.71
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
0.341
0.341
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
0.282
0.282
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.064
0.064
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
0.848
0.848
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
4.39
4.39
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
108
15.01
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Pete Alonso and Jim Thurman
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 9 Innings
942
1.05
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
2.4
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 9 Innings
933
1.04
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.6
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 9 Innings
24317
27
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
45
27
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 9 Innings
8105.2
9
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
9
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 9 Innings
7288
8.09
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
3
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 9 Innings
7232
8.03
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
3
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 9 Innings
99.23
99.23
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 9 Innings
7.677
7.677
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.25
1.25
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 9 Innings
99.04
99.04
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25