Pete Alonso vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Pete Alonso. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .864) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .348). Pete Alonso had the advantage in home run production (264 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pete Alonso and Jim Smith
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
0.253
0.253
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
0.861
0.861
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
0.478
0.478
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
671.71
93.38
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
0.341
0.341
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
0.263
0.263
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
0.282
0.282
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
0.848
0.848
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
642.8
89.36
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 600 PA
108
15.01
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Pete Alonso and Jim Smith
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 9 Innings
942
1.05
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 9 Innings
933
1.04
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 9 Innings
7288
8.09
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 9 Innings
7232
8.03
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 9 Innings
99.23
99.23
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 9 Innings
7.677
7.677
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Pete Alonso
Career
Per 9 Innings
99.04
99.04
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100