Erick Almonte vs. Kim Andrew — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Andrew posted the stronger offensive profile against Erick Almonte. Kim Andrew posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.000 vs .613) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .282). Erick Almonte had the advantage in home run production (2 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Kim Andrew had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Erick Almonte and Kim Andrew
Erick Almonte
Career
Per 600 PA
144
600
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Erick Almonte
Career
Per 600 PA
0.233
0.233
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Erick Almonte
Career
Per 600 PA
0.645
0.645
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Erick Almonte
Career
Per 600 PA
12.29
51.19
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
140.43
Erick Almonte
Career
Per 600 PA
0.282
0.282
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Erick Almonte
Career
Per 600 PA
0.331
0.331
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Erick Almonte
Career
Per 600 PA
0.21
0.21
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
0.35
Erick Almonte
Career
Per 600 PA
12.16
50.65
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
160.83
Erick Almonte
Career
Per 600 PA
4.97
4.97
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
Erick Almonte
Career
Per 600 PA
5
20.83
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Erick Almonte and Kim Andrew
Erick Almonte
Career
Per 9 Innings
44
1.28
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Erick Almonte
Career
Per 9 Innings
928
27
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Erick Almonte
Career
Per 9 Innings
309.1
9
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Erick Almonte
Career
Per 9 Innings
141
4.1
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Erick Almonte
Career
Per 9 Innings
128
3.72
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Erick Almonte
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.78
90.78
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Erick Almonte
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.909
2.909
Kim Andrew
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1