Art Allison vs. Sam Narron — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Art Allison and Sam Narron are closely matched on the surface stats. Sam Narron posted stronger numbers in OPS (.596 vs .564) and on-base percentage (.310 vs .259). Art Allison had the advantage in slugging (.305 vs .286). By the career numbers, Sam Narron had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Art Allison and Sam Narron
Art Allison
Career
Per 600 PA
168
135.12
Sam Narron
Career
Per 600 PA
24
496.55
Art Allison
Career
Per 600 PA
746
600
Sam Narron
Career
Per 600 PA
29
600
Art Allison
Career
Per 600 PA
0.254
0.254
Sam Narron
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Art Allison
Career
Per 600 PA
0.574
0.574
Sam Narron
Career
Per 600 PA
0.603
0.603
Art Allison
Career
Per 600 PA
55.89
44.95
Sam Narron
Career
Per 600 PA
2.37
49.04
Art Allison
Career
Per 600 PA
193
155.23
Sam Narron
Career
Per 600 PA
9
186.21
Art Allison
Career
Per 600 PA
0.259
0.259
Sam Narron
Career
Per 600 PA
0.31
0.31
Art Allison
Career
Per 600 PA
0.305
0.305
Sam Narron
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Art Allison
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Sam Narron
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
Art Allison
Career
Per 600 PA
0.43
0.43
Sam Narron
Career
Per 600 PA
0.45
0.45
Art Allison
Career
Per 600 PA
175
140.75
Sam Narron
Career
Per 600 PA
1
20.69
Art Allison
Career
Per 600 PA
65.58
52.74
Sam Narron
Career
Per 600 PA
3.17
65.68
Art Allison
Career
Per 600 PA
37.3
37.3
Sam Narron
Career
Per 600 PA
14.5
14.5
Art Allison
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Sam Narron
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Art Allison
Career
Per 600 PA
4
3.22
Sam Narron
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Art Allison and Sam Narron
Art Allison
Career
Per 9 Innings
174
0.98
Sam Narron
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
Art Allison
Career
Per 9 Innings
642
3.63
Sam Narron
Career
Per 9 Innings
16
Art Allison
Career
Per 9 Innings
87.11
87.11
Sam Narron
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Art Allison
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.69
3.69
Sam Narron
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.667