Luke Allen vs. Jim McLeod — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Luke Allen and Jim McLeod are closely matched on the surface stats. Jim McLeod posted stronger numbers in slugging (.237 vs .222) and batting average (.203 vs .111). Luke Allen had the advantage in on-base percentage (.273 vs .248). By the career numbers, Jim McLeod had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Luke Allen and Jim McLeod
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.546
0.546
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.178
0.178
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.444
0.444
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
10.01
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
3.67
3.67
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.67
0.67
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
1
54.55
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
Fielding Stats for Luke Allen and Jim McLeod
Luke Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.69
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Luke Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
2.25
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Luke Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Luke Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.333
1.333
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442