Luke Allen vs. Jim Asbell — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Luke Allen and Jim Asbell are closely matched on the surface stats. Jim Asbell posted stronger numbers in slugging (.242 vs .222) and batting average (.182 vs .111). Luke Allen had the advantage in on-base percentage (.273 vs .250). By the career numbers, Jim Asbell had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Luke Allen and Jim Asbell
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.546
0.546
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.514
0.514
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.242
0.242
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.061
0.061
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.178
0.178
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.173
0.173
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.444
0.444
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.407
0.407
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
10.01
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
2.02
33.63
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
3.67
3.67
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
4
4
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.67
0.67
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
0.33
Luke Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
1
54.55
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Luke Allen and Jim Asbell
Luke Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.69
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Luke Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Luke Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.333
1.333
Jim Asbell
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.5