Kim Allen vs. Ron Teasley — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ron Teasley posted the stronger offensive profile against Kim Allen. Ron Teasley posted stronger numbers in OPS (.714 vs .632) and slugging (.429 vs .278). Kim Allen had the advantage in on-base percentage (.354 vs .286). By the career numbers, Ron Teasley had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Allen and Ron Teasley
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Ron Teasley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.747
0.747
Ron Teasley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.714
0.714
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ron Teasley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ron Teasley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Ron Teasley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.056
0.056
Ron Teasley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.219
0.219
Ron Teasley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.236
0.236
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.766
0.766
Ron Teasley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.6
0.6
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
6.19
57.18
Ron Teasley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.84
72.34
Fielding Stats for Kim Allen and Ron Teasley
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
1.57
Ron Teasley
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
0.91
Ron Teasley
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
69
4.5
Ron Teasley
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.18
97.18
Ron Teasley
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.875
2.875
Ron Teasley
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
58.33
58.33
Ron Teasley
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100