Kim Allen vs. John Scott — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, John Scott posted the stronger offensive profile against Kim Allen. John Scott posted stronger numbers in OPS (.671 vs .632) and on-base percentage (.379 vs .354). By the career numbers, John Scott had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Allen and John Scott
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.747
0.747
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.733
0.733
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.379
0.379
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.056
0.056
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.042
0.042
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.219
0.219
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.766
0.766
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.722
0.722
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
16
147.69
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
1
20.69
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
75
75
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Kim Allen and John Scott
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
1.57
John Scott
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.18
97.18
John Scott
Career
Per 9 Innings
80