Kim Allen vs. Cotton Nash — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Allen posted the stronger offensive profile against Cotton Nash. Kim Allen posted stronger numbers in OPS (.632 vs .503) and on-base percentage (.354 vs .316). By the career numbers, Kim Allen had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Allen and Cotton Nash
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
42
387.69
Cotton Nash
Career
Per 600 PA
13
410.53
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Cotton Nash
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.747
0.747
Cotton Nash
Career
Per 600 PA
0.525
0.525
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Cotton Nash
Career
Per 600 PA
0.316
0.316
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Cotton Nash
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.219
0.219
Cotton Nash
Career
Per 600 PA
0.189
0.189
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.766
0.766
Cotton Nash
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
6.19
57.18
Cotton Nash
Career
Per 600 PA
1.1
34.68
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
13
13
Cotton Nash
Career
Per 600 PA
6.33
6.33
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
16
147.69
Cotton Nash
Career
Per 600 PA
1
31.58
Fielding Stats for Kim Allen and Cotton Nash
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
1.57
Cotton Nash
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
2.31
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
0.91
Cotton Nash
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
0.39
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
71
4.63
Cotton Nash
Career
Per 9 Innings
57
10.99
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
69
4.5
Cotton Nash
Career
Per 9 Innings
55
10.61
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.18
97.18
Cotton Nash
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.49
96.49
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.875
2.875
Cotton Nash
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.583
4.583
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
58.33
58.33
Cotton Nash
Career
Per 9 Innings
16.67
16.67