Kim Allen vs. Joe Lutz — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Kim Allen posted the stronger offensive profile against Joe Lutz. Kim Allen posted stronger numbers in OPS (.632 vs .508) and on-base percentage (.354 vs .286). By the career numbers, Kim Allen had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Allen and Joe Lutz
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.747
0.747
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.548
0.548
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.056
0.056
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.056
0.056
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.219
0.219
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.184
0.184
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.766
0.766
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.467
0.467
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
13
13
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
4.67
4.67
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
1.6
1.6
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.67
0.67
Fielding Stats for Kim Allen and Joe Lutz
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
1.57
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.18
97.18
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.875
2.875
Joe Lutz
Career
Per 9 Innings
7.273