Kim Allen vs. Bob Casey — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Bob Casey posted the stronger offensive profile against Kim Allen. Bob Casey posted stronger numbers in slugging (.410 vs .278) and batting average (.231 vs .222). Kim Allen had the advantage in on-base percentage (.354 vs .231). By the career numbers, Bob Casey had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Kim Allen and Bob Casey
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Bob Casey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.747
0.747
Bob Casey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.641
0.641
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Bob Casey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.444
0.444
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Bob Casey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.056
0.056
Bob Casey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
0.18
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.219
0.219
Bob Casey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.206
0.206
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.766
0.766
Bob Casey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.533
0.533
Kim Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
13
13
Bob Casey
Career
Per 600 PA
2.6
2.6
Fielding Stats for Kim Allen and Bob Casey
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
1.57
Bob Casey
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
1.07
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
71
4.63
Bob Casey
Career
Per 9 Innings
32
3.79
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
69
4.5
Bob Casey
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
2.37
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.18
97.18
Bob Casey
Career
Per 9 Innings
62.5
62.5
Kim Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.875
2.875
Bob Casey
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.222
2.222