John Allen vs. Jim Austin — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, John Allen and Jim Austin are fairly close on the surface numbers. Jim Austin posted stronger numbers in ERA (3.06 vs 18) and WHIP (1.380 vs 2.000). John Allen had the advantage in home runs allowed (0 per nine innings vs 0.54). By the career numbers, Jim Austin had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.
Pitching Stats for John Allen and Jim Austin
John Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
4.5
Jim Austin
Career
Per 9 Innings
83
7.47
John Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
4
Jim Austin
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.68
4.68
John Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
Jim Austin
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.211
0.211
John Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
9
Jim Austin
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.66
6.66
John Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Jim Austin
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.54
0.54
John Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Jim Austin
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.07
0.07
John Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
9
Jim Austin
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.04
5.04
John Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
9
Jim Austin
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.32
4.32
John Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2
Jim Austin
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.58
0.58
John Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2
Jim Austin
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.04
1.04
John Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
4.5
Jim Austin
Career
Per 9 Innings
21
1.89
John Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
18
18
Jim Austin
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.24
3.24
John Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Jim Austin
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
0.99
John Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
4
Jim Austin
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.43
0.43
John Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
Jim Austin
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.23
0.23
John Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Jim Austin
Career
Per 9 Innings
37.62
37.62
Fielding Stats for John Allen and Jim Austin
John Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
Jim Austin
Career
Per 9 Innings
83
7.47
John Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Jim Austin
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100