Ham Allen vs. Earle Mack — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ham Allen posted the stronger offensive profile against Earle Mack. Ham Allen posted stronger numbers in OPS (.586 vs .375) and on-base percentage (.271 vs .125). By the career numbers, Ham Allen had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ham Allen and Earle Mack
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.271
0.271
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.586
0.586
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.158
0.158
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.271
0.271
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.314
0.314
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.043
0.043
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.201
0.201
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.431
0.431
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
6.76
57.97
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.37
13.84
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
70
70
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
5.33
5.33
Fielding Stats for Ham Allen and Earle Mack
Ham Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
1.34
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Ham Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
16
0.94
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Ham Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
62
3.62
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25
Ham Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
78.48
78.48
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Ham Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.696
2.696
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Ham Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
69.57
69.57
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
20