Ham Allen vs. Tim Costo — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Tim Costo posted the stronger offensive profile against Ham Allen. Tim Costo posted stronger numbers in OPS (.610 vs .586) and slugging (.343 vs .314). Ham Allen had the advantage in batting average (.271 vs .224). By the career numbers, Tim Costo had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ham Allen and Tim Costo
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.271
0.271
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.224
0.224
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.586
0.586
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.634
0.634
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.158
0.158
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.271
0.271
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.267
0.267
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.314
0.314
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.343
0.343
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.043
0.043
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.201
0.201
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.206
0.206
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
0.431
0.431
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.505
0.505
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
6.76
57.97
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
11.71
48.11
Ham Allen
Career
Per 600 PA
70
70
Tim Costo
Career
Per 600 PA
6.35
6.35
Fielding Stats for Ham Allen and Tim Costo
Ham Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
1.34
Tim Costo
Career
Per 9 Innings
42
1.2
Ham Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
16
0.94
Tim Costo
Career
Per 9 Innings
37
1.06
Ham Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
79
4.62
Tim Costo
Career
Per 9 Innings
147
4.21
Ham Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
62
3.62
Tim Costo
Career
Per 9 Innings
146
4.18
Ham Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
78.48
78.48
Tim Costo
Career
Per 9 Innings
99.32
99.32
Ham Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.696
2.696
Tim Costo
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.476
3.476
Ham Allen
Career
Per 9 Innings
69.57
69.57
Tim Costo
Career
Per 9 Innings
88.1
88.1